Prof. Frank Bradke Inducted into the North Rhine–Westphalia Academy of Sciences and Arts
Prof. Dr. Frank Bradke—Senior Group Leader at the ...
Frank Bradke Elected to the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Prof. Dr. Frank Bradke, neurobiologist at the Germ...
Tobias Ackels receives Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Early Career Award 2025
We warmly congratulate our group leader Dr. Tobias...
Und plötzlich feuert das Gehirn: Erinnerung
Wie entsteht Erinnerung? Unser Kollege Florian Mor...
Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Early Career Award 2025 Goes to Tobias Ackels
Tobias Ackels awarded for pioneering research on s...
Genetic and environmental risk factors cooperate to affect autistic like neuronal phenotypes
Researchers at the University of Bonn have reveale...
Exome sequencing of 20,979 individuals with epilepsy reveals shared and distinct ultra-rare genetic risk across disorder subtypes
New insights from the Epi25 Collaborative highligh...
Region-specific spreading depolarization drives aberrant post-ictal behavior
Bonn researchers uncover how seizure-related focal...
Single-neuron representations of odors in the human brain
Bonn researchers unveil how the brain encodes and ...
Single-neuron Representation of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Number Zero in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe
Bonn and Tübingen researchers uncover how the brai...
Single-neuron Representation of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Number Zero in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe

Bonn and Tübingen researchers uncover how the brain processes zero in both symbolic and nonsymbolic forms.

October 2024 – Zero is a fundamental concept in mathematics, but how does the human brain represent it? A new study from researchers at the Universities of Bonn and Tübingen has provided groundbreaking insights into how neurons in the brain process zero, both in its symbolic form (as the numeral „0“) and in nonsymbolic form (such as an empty set).

Using single-neuron recordings from neurosurgical patients, the researchers found that individual neurons respond either to symbolic zero or nonsymbolic zero, but not both. This suggests that different neuronal networks are involved depending on how zero is represented—whether as a concept of „nothing“ or as a numerical symbol integrated into the number system.

The study also revealed a numerical distance effect, where neurons responded more strongly when zero was compared with nearby numbers, like 1 or 2. This indicates that zero is treated as part of the mental number line. However, a boundary was found in how nonsymbolic zero (empty set) is coded compared to small positive numbers, reflecting the difficulty humans experience in distinguishing zero from „something small.“ In contrast, symbolic zero did not show this boundary, suggesting it integrates more smoothly into the number system.

These findings offer new insights into how our brains handle abstract numerical concepts, particularly the unique nature of zero, and how it evolves from a concept of „nothing“ into an integral part of symbolic mathematics.

For more details, read the full publication https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.08.041

Publication: Esther F. Kutter, Gert Dehnen, Valeri Borger, Rainer Surges, Andreas Nieder, Florian Mormann; Single-neuron representation of nonsymbolic and symbolic number zero in the human medial temporal lobe, Current Biology, 2024.

Scientific contact: Prof. Florian Mormann
Department of Epileptology- Cognitive and Clinical Neurophysiology
Bonn University Hospital
E-Mail: fmormann@yahoo.de

Written by: Dr Michela Barboni, Ph.D